i am still in class listening to ben, wen sheng, yixuan, chai luan and harsono present their ideas.
i am totally fugged today.
this is the first time - i repeat - the first time that i got totally shot at, for almost everything that is in the powerpoint conclusion!
today's problem was to find solution that would cater to the needs of everyone to ensure that road safety is established with the massive population of republicans coming to woodlands as their main point of destination, that would therefore cause congestion.
as with comparison to the others, our motion was to cancel of the first break out,
whereby tosay that we can do without the first break and really just touch on an intensive group discussion and make it more productive.
and with this conclusive statement, we were set on fire with their alibi saying that the first break out is to cater to the group on discussing the problem that has been the source of a
major dispute.
i sensed a total and deliberate dislike among the class audience and the lack of open-mindedness.
we were not stating to cancel off the PBL system, keep the damn system, but change the timing of the different years to a much more obvious difference.
30mins allowance time is still not effective - congestion is still there.
whatever is done, like what the other team's motion of building underground walkway and overhead bridge of 560m in distance.
Also, a team motioned that
No comments:
Post a Comment